Polaroid Photo

Click for the Fine Art and Illustrations of Craig Houghton

leversandpulleys.com Blog

Choose a Topic:

An intellectual says a simple thing in a hard way. An artist says a hard thing in a simple way. -- Charles Bukowski
Site:
RSS 2 FeedAtom Feed
blog radio

JohnEdwards.com

Wed
18
Jul '07

Chris Murphy, back on the corner

Earlier this month, Chris Murphy stood by the entrance doors of the Cheshire Stop & Shop. He shook hands, answered questions, and lent an ear as part of his “Congress on Your Corner” campaign.

from his initial “Congress on Your Corner” mailing:

cm_congress_corner.jpgOver the next two years, working together, we can reinvent how government works. This starts by changing the way your Member of Congress keeps in touch with you. It’s time that government got proactive. Though I always want to hear from you, I am not going to wait for your call. Over the next two years, I’ll be bringing Congress to your corner. “Congress on your Corner” is our new initiative to bring government to every shopping plaza and supermarket in the 5th District so that together, we can set the priorities for our country. My next “Congress on your Corner” is coming up in Cheshire.

I had a number of national concerns I wanted to discuss, but when I visited, I dropped off a folder full of info about the proposed North-End development and zone-changes. He said he hadn’t yet had a chance to learn much about it, but he said he would definitely read-up. In addition to his service in the 110th, he’s also a resident, and his status would have made it (still does) remarkably easy for him to publish a crowd-drawing letter in the Cheshire Herald. I’m not implying any responsibility beyond that which all 27,000+ of us share, but it’s a plus in my book when a congressman can fight the good fight in Washington and spare an hour or two of his personal time on important local issues. He mentioned that he actually lives in the north-end of town. — either way, the interchange zone changes will ultimately affect the whole of Cheshire.

If you’re interested in talking to him about something he’s actually concerned about (i.e. other than local issues, no offense), there are some upcoming opportunities. Generally though, August should be a great time to contact his local office. I’ve always thought of it as vacation time, but August 6 – August 31 is the “Summer District Work Period.”

August Schedule

New Britain

Sunday, August 5, 11am-12:30pm

Stop and Shop

1309 Corbin Avenue, New Britain, CT

Woodbury

Saturday, August 11, 11am-12:30pm

New Morning Store

738 Main Street, South, Woodbury, CT

Southbury

Monday, August 13, 4:30-6pm

Stop and Shop

100 Main Street, North, Southbury, CT

He seems to prefer S&S’s. Regardless of which grocer you prefer, it’s great that he’s doing the outreach — take advantage of it.

Mon
16
Jul '07

The Cheshire Town Post is now open.

Please drop by to visit, and register for, The Cheshire Town Post . It’s an open forum where residents provide all the content. Councilman Tim White’s blog, Tim White Listens, has done a great job of bringing Cheshire together for discussion. In that tradition, I am hosting the Cheshire Town Post in order to provide a substantively different forum where any member can easily set the topic of discussion. Post pictures from your local event or bring the town together to address an issue. The CTP is your show.

Why am I hosting this? My goal is to build up the town’s online community and encourage communication. The Cheshire Town Post is completely non-partisan and open to all points of view. If you think the discussion is coming down more on one side of an issue, get posting!

Oh, and if you’re worried about the technical aspects of how to register and contribute, read the tutorial post .

Mon
2
Jul '07

Help save Cheshire by decorating a tree!

Some of you may have seen this house. Follow the example!

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/nomalls.jpg

A poster on your property is a starting point — people will see it and they’ll want to know more. Be sure to only post these on your own property. My thanks go to Al Sanders for providing the signs, the pictures in this post, and for leading the way!

Download and (Legally) Post These Signs!

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/tree_signs.jpg

No Big Box Stores

No Mall

No Queen Street

Vote No

Need Impact Study

.

Too many in town are familiar only with the propaganda passed out by W/S. They don’t realize what is at stake. If they did, there’d be signs all over town. What is the true cost of the proposed plan changes?

Help tear down the curtain. Let your neighbors know what’s going on! Make some calls! We have the power to turn this around, but it takes information. The police are patrolling the poles for tag sale .. lost dog signs … North-End signs (it is illegal to post on telephone poles, but who encouraged them to enforce this?). The Cheshire Herald only provides token coverage — they want the development and the ad revenue it will bring. This issue is big enough to be front-page every week. Meanwhile, the same position-holding property owners that plan to sell-out the town are running around tearing down signs, harassing residents, and sabotaging debate.

Even if the PZC votes ‘Yes’ to change the laws at the request of the developers, there’s some hope for an appeal.

from the zoning regs

5. Political/Public issue signs:

a. One (1) or more signs per lot, the total aggregate signage per lot not to exceed 8.5 square feet in R-80, R-40, R-20 and R-20A Districts, and 32 square feet in C-1, C-2, C-3,
I-1, and I-2 and Interchange Districts.

c. The responsibility for removal of signs shall lie with the individual or individuals posting said sign or signs.

Get posting!


Why doesn’t anyone want the public to see what’s going on at the P&Z meetings regarding the 400 acre Interchange Zone that will affect Cheshire’s future forever. The meetings are not televised even though the person that runs the camera is already there and the minutes of these meetings are not put on the P&Z Recent Minutes site. There is a total information blackout to 29,000 Cheshire residents. There are more than enough people to blame, the Chair of the P&Z, Voelker, Matt Hall and the Town Manager. All of them support the zone change and the W/C development. Anyone of them could either make these things happen or could sufficently force the issue to make it happen, but none of them want to.
from a post over on Councilman Tim White’s blog

Mon
2
Jul '07

Proposed changes to the Town of Cheshire Plan of Conservation and Development

At the risk of sounding a bit bitter, I have no idea how the same webmaster that only links to the very last set of Planning and Zoning minutes managed to add a brand new hyperlink to the side bar. It’s for the Proposed Revisions to Cheshires Plan of Conservation and Development and Zoning Regulations. I’m thrilled to see that up there, but if they can add that link, they can concurrently link to more than one set of minutes. People are often late to the game. Residents should be able to catch-up when they have the time to get involved.

Anyhow, here are the proposed revisions for the north-end (file date of 6/29/07):

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TOWN OF CHESHIRE
PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

And, if you’re late to the game, familiarize yourself with the development pitch that’s driving the proposed north-end interchange zoning changes. Get to know the interchange area, learn about the rich history of the property, get active, and take part in the discussion over at Councilman Tim White’s blog. Oh, and learn a bit more about Smart Growth.

UPDATE: I’m grateful to have been forwarded the following two items:

June 25 P&Z Minutes

and, an article about the possibility of an appeal if the PZC votes YES.

Why haven’t these meetings been televised? Council members have requested it, residents have requested it, and I’ve learned that the camera operator has been present for the sound equipment!

Sun
1
Jul '07

Freedom River 1971

Freedom River (1971) is narrated by Orsen Welles and written by Joseph Cavella (screenplay) and Warren H. Schmidt (parable). I’d bother convincing you how timeless and relevant this short film is, but Schmidt drives home the point well enough on his own. Let’s not throw it away — democratic freedoms cannot last when they are taken for granted, reframed, or traded away.

Freedom River (1971)

Anyone seen “Is It Always Right to Be Right?” by Schmidt? I haven’t either, but it’s his only other work listed on IMDB, and I’d like to view it.

Sat
23
Jun '07

When You Talk About the Iraq War, Think about ‘What will we talk about today you and I?’

Last night, I read a post over at Crooks and Liars that linked to a piece written by a young Iraqi blogger. I broke down before I finished reading. I’m not forwarding you there to push guilt or to convince you that re-deployment out of Iraq is the only sane or moral choice left (although that’s true). I’m recommending you read it because it’s so unmistakably real, and you can’t talk about something real in abstract terms and get it right unless you hang on tight to all the living breathing directly observable details to which the abstractions refer. When you talk about ‘the war,’ think about, “What will we talk about today you and I?Read it through to the end — it won’t take too long.

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/in_harms_way.jpg
Mohammed Ibn Laith, 16 years old, wrote the post after the death of his brother, a month before the death of his parents, and prior to surviving a recent bombing, alongside his brother and sister, that claimed the lives of his fellow bloggers.

I know that in a couple of days your (mine too?) memory of the piece will have faded. You might forget that Paris Hilton is a fictional character and American Idol is irrelevant. Once again, it will matter to you that your favorite Starbucks recipe could be just a bit better with a little tweaking. But, when you talk about the war, let it remind you of the piece:

What will we talk about today you and I?

Thu
21
Jun '07

Cheshire Developers are Bending the Rules and Selling-Out the Town

Cheshire, we’re getting screwed.

A handful of local developers have stitched themselves into the political fabric of this town. For years they’ve used their pull to shape Cheshire as one might design a product or grow a brand. People have come for the schools, the very visible and very charming pockets of farmland, the tree-lined low-crime streets, and a departure from the paved sprawl conveniently located a few minutes to the north, south, east, and west of us. It’s an attractive package. And, if they weren’t selling us a product with a tampered expiration date, we’d all benefit from their actions.

Unfortunately, the insiders that crafted this product have been spending an increasingly disproportionate amount of time tugging the political threads to push their special projects through planning and zoning. They bought property low as undeveloped and unattractively zoned land, and now they’re selling high as planning and zoning bends the rules so they can subdivide and watch the zeros fly. They build up the product, bend the rules, and cash in.

This fantastic piece in the Hartford Courant says it well:

For one thing, the only industry besides bedding plants (flora, not sheets and pillows) seemed to be real estate – the buying and selling of homes, the subdividing of land parcels that had been in ancestral farm families’ hands until the great-grandchildren got greedy, and the legal haggling over the outcomes of these proposed developments.

For another thing, the same lawyers and representatives from the same families seemed to always show up at Planning and Zoning Commission hearings, proposing one project after another, in-filling what were once comforting zones of undeveloped pasture or farmland.

The usual suspects are cashing in across town, but the interchange zone provides an exceptionally large take. So big, that the mall is going to tarnish their product a bit faster than their usual residential chop-job, but that’s OK by them. It’ll take a few years for the real damage to surface. So, they’re about to ‘flip’ 400 acres. In order to do so, they have to get planning and zoning to bend the rules (here(pdf) and here) — it’s the same game they’ve played all along. If you thought you settled down in a small town committed to keeping it that way, you’re wrong. Any long-timer can tell you high-tales of what his or her neighborhood looked like a mere fifteen, ten, or five years ago. We’re changing fast. The local real-estate moguls are cashing in. The only thing that’s different about the W/S Shoppes at Cheshire project is the scope.

However, I think they’re counting on you to keep quiet. Actually, they’re hoping you never notice. The police are patrolling the telephone poles. They take down the ‘No Mall’ signs, but they haven’t bothered with the year old missing dog signs near my place (or elsewhere) or the ancient tag-sale marker down the road. They’re busy. The same goes for the Planning and Zoning site where one just cannot seem find any meeting minutes that matter. Although, they do a great job of getting more-recent and less relevant minutes up and linked. Only the most recent minutes are posted there. I guess server space is very, very limited. All the while, the Cheshire Herald tells you not to worry, that the complaints you hear are just from a vocal minority that spend their time huffing and puffing about everything. Who benefits from their half-assed coverage? Well, new shops mean increased ad revenue for the paper. Judging by their commitment to obfuscation, they want that revenue pretty badly.

You bought into the town. Now, act to preserve it before they sell it out from underneath you. Familiarize yourself with the proposed zoning changes. Get to know the interchange area, learn about the rich history of the property, and take part in the discussion over at councilman Tim White’s blog. Whatever you do, don’t fall for the W/S time-elapsed photo essay. Think about what effect the shops will have on the rest of Rt. 10 to the south. Stores attract stores — would you rather put a new shop along a pass-through with sporadic traffic or next to a strip mall where the traffic never dies down. Even if they don’t expand beyond the proposed changes to the charter, the property owners up and down the road are going make out like bandits. I don’t mind local officials and their friends capitalizing, so long as they don’t misuse the power of their votes to get there (i.e. vote against Cheshire for their own sake).

So, what can you do? To start with, make some calls. You don’t have to be an expert or well-connected. You just have to care about your town. Go through the whole damned list if you have time. Tell them you’re a voting resident and you don’t want the mall. If they tell you they’re not on the right committee tell them to get out there and convince their friends. It often only takes a few calls to place real pressure on local officials. Or, participate on TWL. Someof them appear to post there. They share the whacky screen name, ‘anonymous.’

Contact info (from the CheshireCT.org site) so you can get active! Be polite (they’re your neighbors), but tell them how you feel.

Town Council
Matt Hall, Chairman, D 272-5717
Michael G. Ecke, D 272-1351 michaele584@aol.com
David E. Orsini, R 250-0331 david.orsini@cox.net
Matt Altieri, D 272-1935 maltieri@cox.net
David C. Schrumm, R 272-2689 dsschrumm@cox.net
Elizabeth Esty, D 271-3248 elizabeth.esty@yale.edu
Thomas Ruocco, R 272-8135 tomruocco@snet.net
Diane D. Visconti, D 272-7719 Vis1795@aol.com
Tim White, R 439-4394 timwhite98@yahoo.com

Town Manager
Milone, Michael 271-6660 mmilone@cheshirect.org

Please realize that we’re not going to get a Main-St-USA promenade, we’re going to get taken for a ride, just like the good people of Canton did:

from a very relevant story in the Hartford Advocate

There are plenty of Cantonites unhappy about the Shoppes, especially since they morphed into something quite different from what the developers first proposed.

“It was originally going to be a ‘Main Street’ with little shops, maybe some office and residential space,” Sevigny said. After beginning the project, the scope changed. “Then they said they needed big-box stores like Kohl’s and Shaw’s [because] the market wouldn’t support the little shops.” Furthermore, they also “threatened to pull stakes and leave if they didn’t get their changes approved.”

Being left with a half-finished project would have been an expensive white elephant for the town…

The Strip-Mall Shoppes at Farmington Valley
http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/beautiful.jpg

Thu
14
Jun '07

Comedy Central’s Lil’ Bush

I just caught the rebroadcast of the Lil’ Bush premier. Lil’ Condi has a crush on GW, Lil’ Cheney gets lodged in an undisclosed location, and they all visit Halliburton-Land. How could I not love it? Here are a few screenshots:

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/lilbush2.JPG

Has the glittery-one yet batted a lash in the direction of Lil’ Condi? Notice the lil’ ‘flip’?

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/lilbush5.JPG

Lil’ Cheney prepares for his big adventure.

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/lilbush6.jpg

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/lilbush7.JPG
http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/lilbush9.JPG

Barbara probably won’t be tuning in.

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/LIL_bush_cheney1.JPG

Really though, don’t forget that there’s nothing loveable about the real family and friends behind the lil’ characters — they’re not incompetent clowns (or even animated 2d icons). The real Lil’ Bush and co. are busy
dismantling the middle-class, trashing the planet, shoving fear down our throats, making us less safe, trampling our rights, driving up oil prices, increasing profits for the oligarchs, and taking over the world PNAC style.

Ahh well. It’s a funny show. I do hope we soon see Lil’ Gonzo.

http://leversandpulleys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/lil_bush1.JPG

Thu
7
Jun '07

Join Senator Dodd in Restoring Habeas Corpus

Where the hell did Habeas go and how do we get him back? Listen to Senator Chris Dodd detail the legislation he submitted to help restore habeas corpus and then sign on to citizen-co-sponsor the bill.

Restoring the Constitution Act of 2007


In February, I re-introduced the Restoring the Constitution Act of 2007. The bill will restore Habeas Corpus protections to detainees, bar information acquired through torture from being introduced as evidence in trials, and limit presidential authority to interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions.

Many thanks, Senator Dodd. By the way, great name for the legislation. Here’s the bill summary and the bill text.

So, head to www.Restore-Habeas.org to become a citizen co-sponsor.

I’d hate to lose him as a Senator, but I’d love to have him as a vice-president. Sorry Chris! But, I’m pushing for Edwards at the top of the ticket. Check out these exerpts from Dodd’s floor speech he made when introducting the bill (from the congressional record @ thomas).

Mr. President, I rise today to introduce the Restoring the Constitution Act of 2007–a bill to provide for the effective prosecution of terrorists and guarantee due process rights. I am pleased to be joined by Senators Leahy, Feingold, and Menendez as original cosponsors. This bill would make significant important changes to the Military Commissions Act of 2006 which became law last October.

I have served in this body for more than a quarter-century, but I remember few days darker than September 28, 2006, the day the Senate passed President Bush’s Military Commissions Act. Let me be honest with you, I believe this body gave in to fear that day. I believe we looked for refuge in the rule of men, when we should have trusted in the rule of law.

To be clear–I absolutely believe that under very clearly proscribed circumstances military commissions can be a useful instrument for bringing our enemies to justice. But those who ask us to choose between national security and moral authority are offering us a false choice, and a dangerous one. Our Nation has been defeating tyrants and would-be tyrants for more than two centuries. And in all that struggle, we’ve never sold our principles–because if We did, we would be walking in the footsteps of those we most despise.

In times of peril, throwing away due process has been a constant temptation–but that is why we honor so highly those who resisted it. At Nuremberg, America rejected the certainty of execution for the uncertainty of a trial, and gave birth to a half-century of moral authority. Today I am asking my colleagues to reclaim that tradition, to put the principles of the Constitution above the passion of the moment. That reclamation can begin today–if we remedy President Bush’s repugnant law. We can do it–and keep America Secure at the same time.

Freedom from torture. The right to counsel. Habeas corpus. To be honest, it still amazes me that we have to come to the floor of the Senate to debate these protections at all. What would James Madison have said if you told him that someday in the future, a Senator from Connecticut would be forced to publicly defend habeas corpus, the defendant’s right to a day in court, the foundation of Our legal system dating back to the 13 century? What have we come to that such long-settled, long-honored rights have been called into question?

All 100 members of this body have been given the gravest of responsibilities. The people of this country have entrusted us with this Nation’s security; and they have entrusted us with this Nation’s principles. But those who argue that our principles stand in the way of our security are sadly, sorely mistaken: They are the source of our strength.

Five months ago, we departed from that source. But it is not too late to turn back. It is not too late to redeem our error. I implore my colleagues to join me.

Join him as a citizen co-sponsor!

Wed
6
Jun '07

John McCain Despises Oath-Breakers, Perjurers, Obstructionists – Unsure About Libby

Last night at the GOP debate, when asked to give a yes or no answer to whether or not he would pardon Scooter Libby, John McCain said, “he’s going through an appeal process. We’ve got to see what happens here.”

That’s some damned straight talk. Let’s see if we can figure out where he stands with a quick look at his closed-door statements from 99′.

from CNN

The Senate faces an awful choice, to be sure. But, to my mind, it is a clear choice. I am persuaded that the President has violated his oath of office by committing perjury and by obstructing justice, and that by so doing he has forfeited his office.

That sounds harsh. But, John, is this strong stance really just about the underlying issue?


It’s not the ‘private misconduct,’ it’s the subversion of the rule of law.

Oh. Well, are oath-breaking obstructionists really so bad?


All of my life, I have been instructed never to swear an oath to my country in vain. In my former profession, those who violated their sworn oath were punished severely and considered outcasts from our society. I do not hold the President to the same standard that I hold military officers to. I hold him to a higher standard. Although I may admit to failures in my private life, I have at all times, and to the best of my ability, kept faith with every oath I have ever sworn to this country. I have known some men who kept that faith at the cost of their lives.

I cannot–not in deference to public opinion, or for political considerations, or for the sake of comity and friendship–I cannot agree to expect less from the President.

“I have known some men who kept that faith at the cost of their lives.” Holy crap! Man, I bet he’ll have some sharp words of criticism for anyone even hinting at a pardon. This guy really takes perjury and obstruction seriously.


And the Senate, as we all know, is going to acquit the President. As much as I would like to, I cannot join in his acquittal.

The circumstances that led to these offenses may be tawdry, trivial to some, and usually of a very private nature. But the President broke the law. Not a tawdry law, not a trivial law, not a private law.

It’s the law. Thanks, John. I Got it.

SEN. MCCAIN: He’s going through an appeal process. We’ve got to see what happens here.